• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Council on Academic Accreditation
  • Home
  • About
    • Members and Meetings
    • Strategic Plan
    • Accreditation Quality Management System
    • Accreditation Volunteers
  • Programs
    • CAA Fees
    • Accreditation Decisions
    • Call for Public Comments
    • Complaints
  • Reporting
    • Standards for Accreditation
    • Candidacy Reporting Procedures
    • Accreditation Reporting Procedures
    • Reporting Changes
    • Student Achievement Measures
  • Site Visits
    • Program Preparation for Site Visits
    • Information for Site Visitors
  • Resources
Home / News / Enforcement of Standards

Enforcement of Standards

August 29, 2016 By Tess Kirsch

What is the CAA’s Responsibility When a Program is Not in Full Compliance with Standards?

The CAA monitors all programs’ compliance with the Standards for Accreditation through review of applications, annual reports, and other special reports as warranted. If the CAA identifies any concerns as a result of a report review, the CAA documents its findings in an Accreditation Action Report to the program and differentiates its findings as areas of non-compliance or areas of partial compliance with the standards. The Council also may indicate areas of follow-up for the program to address; these are elements of standards for which the program remains in full of compliance at the time of the report, but for which the CAA needs additional information.

In its reports, the CAA includes opportunities for the program to explain current circumstances, describe plans to address issues that the program has self-identified, provide required responses to previous citations for non-compliance or partial compliance, and respond to elements noted as requiring follow-up. The Council considers this part of the ongoing dialogue between itself and the program about educational quality improvement through compliance with accreditation standards.

Probation and Withdrawal Decisions

At times, the CAA may place a program on probation, or withdraw accreditation from a program when there is clear evidence of circumstances that jeopardize the capability of the program to provide acceptable educational experiences for the students. A program also may be placed on probation because the program has not corrected deficiencies noted earlier by the CAA.

As an accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education, the CAA must comply with Criterion §602.20 [34 CFR 602.20(a)(2)(iii)]. This criterion requires that if an accrediting agency’s review of a program indicates that the program is not in compliance with any standard, the CAA must establish timelines for programs that are not in full compliance “to take appropriate action to bring itself into compliance with the agency’s standards.” As the programs that the CAA accredits are at least two years in length, the maximum time allowed under this criterion for a program to remain out of compliance is two years. If, after review of a required report, the program remains out of full compliance with any standard and sufficient progress toward compliance has not been demonstrated, the CAA may act to place the program on probation or withdraw its accreditation status in accordance with the policy and procedures outlined in the Accreditation Handbook. However, a program will be placed on probation or have accreditation withdrawn after the review of a third consecutive report reveals that issues continue for the same standard(s) and the program remains not in full compliance with all standards. The CAA applied this clarified interpretation of the recognition criterion with its review of the February 2016 applications and annual report submissions. In order for a probation status to be removed, the program must document compliance with the Standards for Accreditation.

Filed Under: Ask the CAA

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Accreditation Handbook

The Accreditation Handbook contains the policies and procedures that govern the CAA's operations, including the conduct of accreditation reviews of eligible programs.

Standards for Accreditation

The CAA has adopted Standards for Accreditation for review of eligible graduate education programs in audiology and speech-language pathology.

Footer

About ASHA

ASHA-Logo

The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) is the national professional, scientific, and credentialing association for members and affiliates who are audiologists, speech-language pathologists, speech, language, and hearing scientists, audiology and speech-language pathology support personnel, and students.

About the CAA

The Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology (CAA) accredits eligible clinical doctoral programs in audiology and master's degree programs in speech-language pathology. The CAA relies on a dedicated corps of volunteers serving as Council members and site visitors to accomplish the work of the accreditation program.

Contact the CAA

Questions and/or requests for information about accreditation or the CAA can be directed to:

The Council on Academic Accreditation in
Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
2200 Research Boulevard, #310
Rockville, MD 20850

800-498-2071

E-Mail the CAA

Connect with ASHA

ASHA Community ASHA Community ASHA on Facebook ASHA on Facebook ASHA on Twitter ASHA on Twitter ASHA on LinkedIn ASHA on LinkedIn ASHA on YouTube ASHA on YouTube ASHA on Pinterest ASHA on Pinterest ASHA on Instagram ASHA on Instagram
© 1997-2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
SITE HELP | PRIVACY STATEMENT | TERMS OF USE